Phenomenological understanding of subjectivity and its significance for psychology

Authors

  • Tetiana Rosiychuk Candidate of Psychological Sciences, senior researcher of the Laboratory of Methodology and History of Psychology of the Institute of Psychology named after GS Kostyuk NAUP of Ukraine, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.093

Keywords:

phenomenology, lifeworld, subjectivity, the natural science approach, the principle of rational humanism, personality concept

Abstract

The article explores the basics of phenomenological program offered by Husserl to psychology. Actualization of the phenomenological approach matches with enlarging the natural science expansion to the sphere of the subjective. Once again this situation bringes up the class of problems that has been touched upon in two ideologically different works on the crisis in science by philosopher E. Husserl and psychologist L.S. Vygotsky. However, we believe that the evolution of Vygotsky’s view led him eventually to laying the foundations of the essentially phenomenological concept of the development of personality, which was not find a room in psychology. Guided by his discoveries, and based on the ideas of philosophers and psychologists of the phenomenological circle, we see an opportunity to elaboratethe speaking development concept on the basis of the main eventness moments in the development of subjectivity.

References

Antropologicheskie matritsyi ХХ veka. L.S.Vygotsky – P.A. Florensky: nesostoyavshiysya dialog – Priglashenie k dialogu (2007), [Anthropological matrix of XX century. L.S. Vygotsky – P.A. Florensky: the failed dialogue – Invitation to Dialogue], A.I. Oleksenko, Yu.V. Gromyiko [Ed.]. Moscow, Russia, 666 p.

Ball G.A. (2009), “Psihologicheskie printsipyi sovremennogo gumanizma”, Voprosyi psihologii, no 6, pp. 3–12.

Ball G.A. (2013) “Raciogumanizm kak forma sovremennogo gumanizma i jego znachenie dlya metodologii poznaniya chjeloveka”, Mir psihologii, no 3, pp. 208–223.

Bibler V.S. (1991), Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kulturyi. Dva filosofskih vvedeniya v dvadtsat pervyiy vek [From the teaching of science to the logic of culture. Two philosophical introduction to the twenty first century], Moscow, 414 p.

Vyigotskiy L.S. (1984), Work in 6 vol. Vol. 4, Moscow: Pedagogika, 433 p.

Vygotsky L.S. (2005), Istoricheskiy smysl psihologicheskogo krizisa (The historical sense of psychological crisis), Psihologiya razvitiya cheloveka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 41–190.

Gaydenko P.P. (1966), Problema intentsionalnosti u Gusserlya i ekzistentsialistskaya kategoriya transtsendentsii. Sovremennyiy ekzistentsializm, . Moscow: “Myisl”, pp. 77–107.

Gaydenko P. (2000), Istoriya novoevropeyskoy filosofii v ee svyazi s naukoy [The history of modern European philosophy in its connection with science], Moscow, St.Petersburg, Russia, 456 p.

Gogotishvili L.A. (2007), Nepryamoe govorenie [Indirect speaking], Moscow, Russia, 720 p.

Husserl E. (2004), Krizis evropeyskih nauk i transtsendentalnaya fenomenologiya [Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology]; per.s nem. D.V.Sklyadnev, St.Petersburg, Russia, 399 p.

Zinchenko V.P. (2000), Mysl i Slovo Gustava Shpeta (vozvraschenie iz nebyitiya) [Thought and word of Gustav Shpet (return from oblivion)], Moscow, Russia, pp. 208.

Zinchenko V.P. (2010), Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt [Consciousness and the creative act], Moscow, Russia, pp. 592.

Zinchenko V.P., Mamardashvili M.K. (1977), “Problema ob’ektivnogo metoda v psihologii”, Voprosyi filosofii, no 7, [ http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_ content&task=view&id=25].

Prechtl P. (1999), Vvedenie v fenomenologiyu Gusserlya [Introduction to the phenomenology of Husserl]; per.s nem. I.Inishev, Tomsk: Izdatelstvo “Vodoley”, 96 p.

Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. (2012), Zerkala v mozge: O mehanizmah sovmestnogo deystviya i soperezhivaniya [Mirrors in the brain: On the mechanisms of joint action and empathy]; per. s angl. O. A. Kurakova, M. V. Falikman, Moscow, Russia, 208 p.

Sevalnikov A.Yu. (2015), “Igraet li Bog v kosti?”, Elektronnyiy filosofskiy zhurnal Vox / Golos: http://vox-journal.org Vol. 18.

Ushakova T.N. (1985), “Problema vnutrenney rechi”, Voprosyi psihologii, no 2, pp. 39-51.

Horkhaymer M., Adorno T. V. (1997), Dialektika prosvescheniya. Filosofskie fragmentyi; per. s nem. M.Kuznetsov, Moscow, St.Petersburg, Russia, 312 p.

Chernigovskaya T. (2013), “Eto ne ya – eto moy mozg …Opasnyie vremena dlya chelovecheskogo v cheloveke”, Otechestvennyie zapiski, no 1(52), [http://magazines. russ.ru/oz/2013/1/11ch.html].

Yaroshevsky M.G. (1993), “Perezhivanie i drama razvitiya lichnosti (poslednee slovo L.S.Vyigotskogo)”, Voprosyi filosofii, no 3, pp. 82-91.

Pasley B.N, David S.V. аt al. (2012) Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex, Plos Biology, no 10(1): e1001251. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001251

Spiegelberg H. Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry. H. Spiegelberg. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972, 413 p.

Wertsch J.V. (1985), Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press, 281 p.

Downloads

Issue

No. 2 (2017): Psychology & society

Section

Статті

License

1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Rosiychuk, Tetiana. “Phenomenological Understanding of Subjectivity and Its Significance for Psychology”. Psyhology & Society, no. 2, Mar. 2019, pp. 93-103, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.093.