Psychological advice and guidance on activation the professional responsibility of psychologists

Arsen Lypka


The article substantiates the recommendations for activating the professional responsibility of students-psychologists on the basis of the proposed by us aspects of the professional life of a specialist as responsible deed (situational, intentional, thought-active, reflexive), which are created according to the requirements of the cyclic-action approach, they are focused on the content and category-concept apparatus of constituents of his professional responsibility – cognitive, emotional-motivational, behavioral-volitional, moral-spiritual. At the same time, the subject matter of the recommendations covers a set of professional advice, algorithms, prescriptive guidelines, rules, principles of activation, development and strengthen of its professional responsibility components. Practically oriented set of recommendations is aimed both at forming the ability of future psychologists to take personal responsibility for their own actions, as well as at professional genesis of their cognitive, volitional, behavioral, moral qualities of professional responsibility, willingness and determination to give the word on the execution of a case, self-efficacy, competence, productivity, reliability of the specialist, ability to adhere to obligations, ethics, principles stated, positions, declared actions for any, even extremely unfavorable circumstances, as well as situational factors (first of all conditions and factors) in the system of professional interaction “person – society”, “psychologist – client”. Adherence and self-testing of the developed practical recommendations is marked step by step – firstly, psycho-emotionally, and then self-regulatorly and professionally.

Ключові слова

practical recommendations; professional responsibility; actualization

Повний текст:



Bodrov, V. A. & Lutsenko, A. G. (1991). Professionalnaya otvetstvennost kak psihologicheskaya kategoriya subjekta deyatelnosti. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya problemy formirovaniya professionala, 157–167. Moscow: In-t psihologii AN SSSR [in Russian].

Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2009). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv, Irpin: VTF “Perun” [in Ukrainian].

Suntsova, Y. S. (2011). Diagnostika professionalnogo samoopredeleniya. Vol. 2. Izhevsk: Izdatelstvo “Udmurtskiy universitet” [in Russian].

Druzhilov, S. A. (2005). Psihologiya professionalizma subjekta truda: kontseptualnyie osnovaniya. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena. Vol. 6, 5 (12), 30–43 [in Russian].

Dubovitskaya, T. D. (2004). Diagnostika urovnya professionalnoy napravlennosti studentov. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2, 82–86 [in Russian].

Tolochek, V. A. (2009). Professionalnaya uspeshnost: ot sposobnostey k resursam (dopolnyayuschie paradigmy). Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vyisshey shkolyi ekonomiki, 3. S. 27–61 [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoi refleksii. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 72–85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, O. (2015). Hromadianska vidpovidalnist osobystosti yak predmet psykholohichnoho doslidzhennia. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 65–91 [in Ukrainian].

Shaldyibina, O. N. (2009). Professionalnaya otvetstvennost v strukture sotsialno-psihologicheskih harakteristik lichnosti rukovoditelya nizovogo zvena. Samara [in Russian].



  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.

ISSN 2523-4099 (online), ISSN 1810-2131 (print)