Cascade of subjects vital game modeling

Oleh Khayrulin

Анотація


The existence of man in the modern reality of postmodern occurs as a series of interconnected work connotations. These connotations have a complex, multilevel subjective-centric nature, but essentially depend on the conditions for their implementation. The postmodern era is characterized by an increase in the manifold human development lines, by the continuous transformations of the incentives and motives of its activity, and by the high risk of manipulating consciousness. Modern media space is saturated with information. contains an unbalanced variety of meanings, images and patterns that destabilizes the mental ecology of personality and society. This provokes the spread of the social phenomenon “das Man”, creates the risks of mental reduction and regression of man. Such phenomena can negatively affect the socio-psychological and political pressures of society, increase the probability of various individual and social risks. In the conditions of postmodern, the defining attribute of human life is communication of all levels - from routine communication to mass, strategic communication. In this case, the productive communicative activity of the subject is based on the relevant principles, which are strategic, combinatory, critical, reflexive, practical, technical, situational, ecumenical and culturally significant content. Due to the peculiarities and paradoxes of the media space, the phenomenon of the game becomes important and functions of a separate matrix of communication. The game realized as a means of objectification the interests of the subject and the social group on the whole range of probable conditions and situations - from co-operative coexistence and solidarity to expressive confrontation, crisis and loss risks. The game appears as a theoretical construct and practical means of human activity in the postmodern environment, as a means of its effective counteraction to manipulation, external management of consciousness and action activity. The distribution of the effects of the game on small, medium and large social groups can lead to the consolidation and branching of the culture of co-operative, ecological co-existence of citizens in all external conditions, including competitive and conflict. As a third type of leading activity in the taxonomic tuple of such types, games phenomenon psychologically determines the success of the social functioning of modern humans. Under such conditions, the basis of the life of a modern person is game modeling as the implementation of a communicative-strategic cascade of appropriate means of the subject. The topography of the cascade includes the tops of the individual and socio-psychological space of the person: 1) the inner-subjective space-topos of the spiritual essence of man; 2) a topos of reflexive meanings and meanings of household, near-communication of the subject; 3) the topos of the accomplished activity of the subject as a person and 4) the topos of mass communication as the highest level of self-realization of man. The act of man is the passage of all elements as comprehension-mastering-management of the The communicative basis of human self-realization in the context of a communicative game is the triumvirate of existential universals, metaforms - Word, Image, Action, which implement an act of purposeful activity as a Deed. Any act of human activity unfolds through the structural and functional content of the cascade, which includes: a) the communicative culture of the subject; b) his communicative strategies; c) communicative tactics; and d) communicative acts. Types of communicative strategy (cooperative, cooperative-manipulative, conflict-manipulative and conflict) are forming significance of cascade realization. The quality of the game simulation of the subject’s life through the principles of application, means, capabilities and structural and functional content of his communicative-strategic cascade determines and determines the success of such life.


Ключові слова


postmodern; uncertainty; game, game modeling; structural-functional matrix; communication

Повний текст:

PDF>PDF

Посилання


Akademіk Romenec’. Tvorchіst’ і pracі: zbіrnik statej (2016). Kiїv: Libіd’, [in Ukrainian].

Grahov V.P., Koval’ O.S., Rybnov E.I. (2014). Teoriya i praktika razrabotki prinyatiya i realizacii upravlencheskih reshenij v predprinimatel’stve. Sankt-Pererburg: ANO “IPEHV” [in Russian].

Bek U. (2000). Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya, [in Russian].

Bekh V.P. (1999). Filosofiya social’nogo mira: gnoseologicheskij analiz. Zaporozh’e : “Tandem - U”, [in Russian].

Bibliya. Knigi Svyashchennogo Pisaniya Vethogo i Novogo Zaveta. Kanonicheskie. V Russkom Perevode s Parallel’nymi Mestami, [in Russian].

Bodrijyar ZH. (2015) Simulyakry i simulyacii. Moscow : Izdatel’skij dom “POSTUM”, [in Russian].

Bodrіyar ZH. (2010). Fatal’nі strategії L’vіv: Kal’varіya, [in Ukrainian].

Bol’nov O. F. (1999) Filosofiya ehkzistencializma. Sankt-Pererburg: Izdatel’stvo “Lan’”,. 224 s. [in Russian].

Braun S., Vogan K. (2015). Igra. Kak ona vliyaet na nashe voobrazhenie, mozg i zdorov’e. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, i Ferber, [in Russian].

Burd’e P. (1994). Nachala. Choses dites. Moscow: Socio-Logos, [in Russian].

Burd’yo P. (2007). Sociologiya social’nogo prostranstva. Moscow: Institut ehksperimental’noj sociologii, [in Russian].

Burd’yo P. (1993). Sociologiya politiki. Moscow: Socio-Logos, [in Russian].

van Dejk T.A. (2000). YAzyk. Poznanie. Kommunikaciya : monografiya . Blagoveshchensk: BGK im. I.A. Boduehna de Kurteneh,. 308 s. [in Russian].

Vitgenshtejn L. (1999). Golubaya kniga. Moscow: Dom intelleketual’noj knigi, [in Russian].

Vitgenshtejn L. (1994). Filosofskie raboty. CHast’ I. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Gnozio,. 612 s. [in Russian].

Giddens EH. (2004) Uskol’zayushchij mir: kak globalizaciya menyaet nashu zhizn’. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Ves’ Mir”, [in Russian].

Gerchanіvs’ka P.E. (2015). Kul’turologіya. Kiїv: Nacіonal’na akademіya kadrіv kul’turi і mistectv, [in Ukrainian].

Grajs G.P. (1985). Logika i rechevoe obshchenie. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vypusk 16. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika. Moscow: Progress, [in Russian].

Docenko E.L. (1997). Psihologiya manipulyacii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, [in Russian].

Zinchenko V.P. (2010). Soznanie i tvorcheskij akt : monografiya. Moscow: YAzyki slavyanskih kul’tur, [in Russian].

Jonas G. (2001). Princip vіdpovіdal’nostі. U poshukah etiki dlya tekhnologіchnoї civіlіzacії. Kiїv: Lіbra, [in Ukrainian].

Kajua R. (2007). Igry i lyudi; Stat’i i ehsse po sociologii kul’tury. Moscow: OGI, [in Russian].

Kan-Kalik V. (1987). Uchitelyu o pedagogicheskom obshchenii. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, [in Russian].

Kara-Murza S.G. (2005). Manipulyaciya soznaniem. Moscow: EHksmo [in Russian].

Kuli CH. (1994). Obshchestvennaya organizaciya. Moscow: Nauka, [in Russian].

Liotar ZH.-F. (1998). Sostoyanie postmoderna. Moscow: Institut ehksperimental’noj sociologii, [in Russian].

Mak-Kvejl D. (2010). Teorіya masovoї komunіkacії. L’vіv : Lіtopis, [in Ukrainian].

Nejman Dzh. fon, Morgenshtern O. (1970). Teoriya igr i ehkonomicheskoe povedenie. Moscow: [in Russian].

Novaya filosofskaya ehnciklopediya: V 4 t. (2010). Т. I. Moscow : In-t filosofii RAN, [in Russian].

Novaya filosofskaya ehnciklopediya: V 4 t. (2010). Т. ІI. Moscow : In-t filosofii RAN, [in Russian].

Novaya filosofskaya ehnciklopediya: V 4 t. (2010). Т. ІІI. Moscow : In-t filosofii RAN, [in Russian].

Prigozhin I., Stengers I. (1986). Poryadok iz haosa: Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj. Moscow: Progress, [in Russian].

Psihologіchna enciklopedіya. (2006). Kiїv: Akademvidav, [in Ukrainian].

Psihologicheskij slovar’. (1983). Moscow: Nauch.-issled. in-t obshchej i pedagogicheskoj psihologii Akad. ped. nauk SSSR. Pedagogika, [in Russian].

Ostin D. (2006). Tri sposoba prolit’ chernila. Moscow: Kolopotina, [in Russian].

Selіvanova O.O. (2008). Suchasna lіngvіstika: napryami ta problemi. Poltava: Dovkіllya-K, [in Ukrainian].

Sedov K.F. (2011). Diskurs kak suggestiya : Irracional’noe vozdejstvie v mezhlichnostnom obshchenii. Moscow: Labirint, [in Russian].

Sedov K.F. (2003). O manipulyacii i aktualizacii v rechevom vozdejstvii. Problemy rechevoj kommunikacii. Vyp. 2. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, С. 20–27. [in Russian].

Sternin I.A. (2001). Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdejstvie. Voronezh: Istoki, [in Russian].

Stehnding Gaj. (2014). Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, [in Russian].

Titarenko T.M. (2014). Psihologіchnі praktiki konstruyuvannya zhittya v umovah postmodernoї socіal’nostі. Kiїv : Mіlenіum, [in Ukrainian].

Fіlosofs’kij enciklopedichnij slovnik (2002). Kiїv: “Abris”, [in Ukrainian].

Florenskij P.A. (1998). U vodorazdelov mysli. Imena. Moscow –Har’kov, [in Russian].

Furman A.V. (2015). Svіt metodologії. Psihologіya і suspіl’stvo. №2, 47–61, [in Ukrainian].

Furman A.V. (2016). Іdeya і zmіst profesіjnogo metodologuvannya. Ternopіl’: TNEU, [in Ukrainian].

Furman A.V. (2007). Navchal’na problemna situacіya yak ob’єkt psihologіchnogo pіznannya. Psihologіya і suspіl’stvo. №1, 9–80, [in Ukrainian].

Furman A.V. (2007). Teorіya navchal’nih problemnih situacіj: psihologo-didaktichnij aspekt. Ternopіl’: Ekon. dumka, [in Ukrainian].

Hajrulіn O.M. (2016). Teorіya “fokal’noї tochki” (T. SHellіng) ta teorіya “perspektiv” (D. Kaneman) yak osnova rozvitku refleksivnoї kompetentnostі ukraїns’kogo ofіcera. Zbіrnik naukovih prac’ NAOU. №1, 133–139, [in Ukrainian].

Hajrulіn O.M. (2017). Teoretiko-psihologіchnij analіz zmіstu kategorіjnogo ponyattya “gra”. Psihologіya і suspіl’stvo. №3, 32–50, [in Ukrainian].

Hajrulіn O.M. (2017). Znachennєvo-smislovij gorizont neviznachenostі yak psihologіchnoї kategorії. Psihologіya і suspіl’stvo. №4, 56–81, [in Ukrainian].

Hajrulіn O.M. (2018). Svіt neviznachenostі ta іgrove modelyuvannya sub’єkta (konturi doslіdnic’koї programi). Vіtakul’turnij mlin. Modul’ 20, 67-75, [in Ukrainian].

Hajrulіn O.M. (2018). Psihologіchnі vimіri іgrovogo modelyuvannya u vіjs’kovіj spravі. Psihologіya і suspіl’stvo. №1-2, 83–108, [in Ukrainian].

Hyojzinga J. (2011). Homo ludens. CHelovek igrayushchij. Sankt-Pereburg : Izd-vo Ivana Limbaha, [in Russian].

Enciklopediya ehpistemologii i filosofii nauki. (2009). Moscow: “Kanon+” ROOI “Reabilitaciya”, [in Russian].

Sharkov F.I. (2010). Kommunikologiya: osnovy teorii kommunikacii. Moscow: Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporaciya “Dashkov i K°”,[in Russian].

Shejnov V.P. (2008). Skrytoe upravlenie chelovekom. Minsk: AST, Harvest [in Russian].

Shiller G. (1980). Manipulyatory soznaniem. Moscow: Mysl’, [in Russian].

Shostrom EH. (2008). CHelovek-manipulyator. Vnutrennee puteshestvie ot manipulyacii k aktualizacii. Moscow : Aprel’-Press, Psihoterapiya, [in Russian].

Schchedrovickij G.P. (2004). Organizacionno-deyatel’nostnaya igra. T9 (1). Moscow : Nasledie MMK, [in Russian].

Joint Publication 3-61 Public Affairs, 9 May, 2005, [in English].

Amos C. Fox and Andrew J. Rossow. (2017). Making Sense of Russian Hybrid Warfare: A Brief Assessment of the Russo–Ukrainian War, The Institute of Land Warfare, ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY, LAND WARFARE PAPER No. 112, March, [in English].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.02.066

Посилання

  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.


ISSN 2523-4099 (online), ISSN 1810-2131 (print)